Volume 169, Issue 2 p. 253-257
Original Research

Algorithmic Identification of Patients With Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease Using an Electronic Health Record

Michael Tao MD

Corresponding Author

Michael Tao MD

Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA

Corresponding Author: Michael Tao, MD, Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Roberts BA

Sarah Roberts BA

Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Arnold MD

Mark Arnold MD

Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 January 2023
Citations: 2

This article was presented at the AAO-HNSF 2022 Annual Meeting & OTO Experience; September 10-13, 2022; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether an electronic health record (EHR) system can be used to identify cases of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in an area outside of a regional referral center with low rates of aspirin desensitization therapy.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review single academic tertiary care hospital.

Setting

Single-site academic tertiary care hospital.

Methods

Using Epic's SlicerDicer function, an algorithm was created and applied to all patient charts from 2013 to 2021. The algorithm was as follows: “Allergy/Contraindication to NSAIDs OR aspirin” AND “Diagnosis of Nasal polyp AND “Diagnosis of Asthma.” Clinical data including demographics, NSAID reaction, and specialist involvement was collected.

Results

A total of 54 potential cases of AERD were identified. Thirty-two were determined to have AERD after chart review, yet 12 of these patients (37.5%) had no mention of AERD within the chart. The 54 patients were stratified into 2 cohorts based on reaction to NSAIDs: respiratory (n = 29) or unspecified (n = 25). Of the patients in the respiratory reaction group, 26 were found to have clinical AERD, demonstrating a positive predictive values (PPV) of 89.7%. The overall PPV was 59.3%. Those with a respiratory reaction to NSAIDS listed in the EHR were more likely to have clinical AERD (odds ratio 27.44; confidence interval 6.08-123.85; p < 0.0001). Only 2 patients (6.3%) underwent aspirin desensitization.

Conclusion

AERD remains under-diagnosed in the study population. The informatics algorithm presented here has a high positive predictive value for identifying clinical AERD patients in a geographical area with low rates of aspirin desensitization and may aid in identifying candidates for expanded treatment options.