Volume 139, Issue 1 p. 87-93
Original Research–Pediatric Otolaryngology

Digital images for postsurgical follow-up of tympanostomy tubes in remote Alaska

John Kokesh MD

Corresponding Author

John Kokesh MD

Alaska Native Medical Center, Otolaryngology, Anchorage, AK

Corresponding author: John F. Kokesh, MD, AK Native Med Ctr Dept of ENT, 4315 Diplomacy Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508-5926. E-mail address: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
A. Stewart Ferguson PhD

A. Stewart Ferguson PhD

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium: AFHCAN, Anchorage, AK

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Patricoski MD

Chris Patricoski MD

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium: AFHCAN, Anchorage, AK

Search for more papers by this author
Kathryn Koller RN, MSN

Kathryn Koller RN, MSN

Community Health, Anchorage, AK

Search for more papers by this author
Greg Zwack MD

Greg Zwack MD

Alaska Native Medical Center, Otolaryngology, Anchorage, AK

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen Provost DO, MPH

Ellen Provost DO, MPH

Epidemiology Center, Anchorage, AK

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Holck PhD

Peter Holck PhD

Burns School of Medicine, Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology, Anchorage, AK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 2008
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objective

To determine if video otoscope still images of the tympanic membrane taken in remote clinics are comparable to an in-person microscopic examination for follow-up care.

Design

Comparative concordance, diagnostic reliability.

Methods

Community health aide/practitioners in remote Alaska imaged 70 ears following tympanostomy tube placement. The patients were then examined in person by two otolaryngologists. Images were later reviewed at 8 and 14 weeks.

Results

Intraprovider concordance for physical examination findings was: “Tube in,” 94 percent-97 percent (κ = 0.89-0.94); “Tube patent,” 94 percent −97 percent (κ = 0.89-0.94); “Drainage,” 90 percent-96 percent (κ = –0.04-0.38); “Perforation,” 90 percent −96 percent (κ = 0.61-0.82); “Granulation,” 97 percent −100 percent (κ = 0.49-1.0); “Middle ear fluid,” 88 percent −96 percent (κ = 0.28-0.71); “Retracted,” 83 percent-91 percent (κ = 0.26-0.58). These agreement rates are similar to interprovider concordance when two otolaryngologists examine the same patient in person. Intraprovider concordance for diagnoses was 76 percent −80 percent (κ = 0.64-0.71) and 77 percent −88 percent (κ = 0.66-0.81) when poor images were excluded. Interprovider diagnostic concordance for the in-person exam was 89 percent (κ = 0.83).

Conclusion

Video-otoscopy images of the tympanic membrane are comparable to an in-person examination for assessment and treatment of patients following tympanostomy tubes. Store-and-forward telemedicine is an acceptable method of following patients post tympanostomy tube placement.