Volume 127, Issue 1 p. 13-21
Article

Clinical Staging for Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Michael Friedman MD

Corresponding Author

Michael Friedman MD

Department of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center and Division of Otolaryngology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Reprint requests: Michael Friedman, MD, Department of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612-3833; e-mail, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Hani Ibrahim MD

Hani Ibrahim MD

Department of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center and Division of Otolaryngology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Lee Bass BS

Lee Bass BS

Department of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center and Division of Otolaryngology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2016
Citations: 30

Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Denver, CO, September 9–12, 2001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic indicators that would lead to stratification of patients likely to have successful surgery for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) versus those destined to fail.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed 134 patients to correlate palate position and tonsil size to the success of the UPPP as based on postoperative polysomnography results. Similar to our previously published data on the Friedman Score as a predictor of the presence and severity of SDB, the palate position was determined on physical examination of the oral cavity and was graded for each patient. This grade combined with tonsil size was used to stage the patients. Stage I was defined as having palate position 1 or 2 combined with tonsil size 3 or 4. Stage II was defined as having palate position 3 or 4 and tonsil size 3 or 4. Stage III patients had palate position 3 or 4 and tonsil size 0, 1, or 2. Any patient with body mass index of greater than 40 was placed in the stage III group. The results of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) were then graded as success or failure and success rates were compared by stage.

SETTING

Academically affiliated tertiary care referral center.

RESULTS

Stage I patients who underwent UPPP had a success rate of 80.6%, stage II patients had a success rate of 37.9%, and stage III patients had a success rate of 8.1%.

CONCLUSION

A clinical staging system for SDB based on palate position, tonsil size, and body mass index is presented. It appears to be a valuable predictor of the success of UPPP. Additional studies and wider use of the staging system will ultimately define its role in the treatment of SDB.