Volume 146, Issue 5 p. 774-781
Otology and Neurotology

Electrocochleography during Cochlear Implantation for Hearing Preservation

Marco Mandalà MD

Marco Mandalà MD

ENT Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Liliana Colletti PhD

Liliana Colletti PhD

ENT Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Tonoli MD

Giovanni Tonoli MD

ENT Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Vittorio Colletti MD

Corresponding Author

Vittorio Colletti MD

ENT Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Vittorio Colletti, MD, ENT Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10; 37134 Verona, Italy Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 January 2012
Citations: 3

No sponsorships or competing interests have been disclosed for this article.

This article was presented at the 2011 AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting & OTO EXPO; September 11-14, 2011; San Francisco, California.

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether intraoperative electrocochleography during cochlear implant surgery provides online feedback to modify surgical procedure, reduce trauma, and increase preservation of residual hearing.

Study Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary referral center, Otolaryngology Department, University of Verona.

Subjects and Methods

Twenty-seven adult patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery who had low- to mid-frequency (0.25-2 kHz) auditory thresholds measured preoperatively were enrolled. Fifteen subjects had compound action potentials measured to assess cochlear function during surgery. In those patients, surgery was modified according to electrocochleographic feedback. Twelve control subjects underwent cochlear implant surgery with blinded electrocochleographic monitoring.

Results

The average preoperative pure-tone audiometry thresholds (0.25-2 kHz) were 74.3 ± 10.2 and 81.5 ± 12.7 dB hearing level (HL) in the electrocochleographic feedback and control cohorts, respectively (P >. 05). Compound action potential recordings showed a mean maximum latency shift of 0.63 ± 0.36 ms and normalized amplitude deterioration of 59% ± 19% during surgery. All of these changes reverted to normal after electrode insertion in all but 1 subject in the electrocochleographic feedback group. The average shifts in postoperative pure-tone average threshold (0.25-2 kHz), evaluated before activation, were 8.7 ± 4.3 and 19.2 ± 11.4 dB HL in the electrocochleographic feedback and control cohorts, respectively (P =. 0051). Complete hearing preservation (loss of ≤10 dB) at 1 month before activation was achieved in 85% (11/13) of electrocochleographic feedback subjects and in 33% (4/12) of control patients (P =. 0154).

Conclusion

Monitoring cochlear function with electrocochleography gives real-time feedback during surgery, providing objective data that might help in modifying the surgical technique in ways that can improve the rate of hearing preservation.