Volume 158, Issue 5 p. 934-941
Pediatric Otolaryngology

Validations of the OM-6 Parent-Proxy Survey for Infants/Toddlers with Otitis Media

Joy Tao

Joy Tao

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kristine Schulz DrPH, MPH

Kristine Schulz DrPH, MPH

Division of Head and Neck Cancer & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Donna B. Jeffe PhD

Donna B. Jeffe PhD

Department of Medicine, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Judith E. C. Lieu MD, MSPH

Corresponding Author

Judith E. C. Lieu MD, MSPH

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA

Corresponding Author: Judith E. C. Lieu, MD, MSPH, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8115, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 January 2018
Citations: 1
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Abstract

Objective

To validate the Otitis Media–6 (OM-6), a parent-proxy quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire for infants/young children with OM, against other previously validated generic QOL questionnaires.

Study Design

Multi-institutional cross-sectional study.

Setting

Twenty-three otolaryngology, pediatric, and family practices across the United States.

Subjects and Methods

Caregivers of 6- to 24-month-old children with a history of OM completed the OM-6, OM History Form, and Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Infant Scales survey. Principal components analysis (PCA) examined the underlying factor structure of items on the OM-6, and Cronbach's α measured the internal consistency of items on each factor. Discriminant validity was assessed with receiver operating curves (ROCs).

Results

Surveys from 1045 patients were analyzed. The overall OM-6 was strongly to moderately correlated with the PedsQL Infant Scales scores (Pearson r = −0.649 for ages 6-12 months and −0.566 for ages 13-24 months). Two underlying constructs, “Behavior and Symptoms” and “Hearing and Speech,” emerged from the PCA. Each factor and the overall OM-6 showed excellent internal consistency reliability (each Cronbach's α >0.75). The areas under the curve on the ROC analyses were <0.65 for recurrent and chronic OM using a variety of frequency and chronicity cut-points and definitions.

Conclusion

The OM-6 measures 2 underlying QOL constructs, Behavior and Symptoms and Hearing/Speech. The overall OM-6 showed acceptably high internal consistency reliability and good construct validity. However, the ability of the OM-6 to identify children who have more severe clinical recurrent or chronic OM vs milder disease was not supported by our analysis.