Volume 160, Issue 5 p. 762-782
Review Articles

Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review

Jerome R. Lechien MD, PhD, MS

Corresponding Author

Jerome R. Lechien MD, PhD, MS

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium

Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, University Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Corresponding Author: Jerome R. Lechien, MD, PhD, MS, Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mons, Avenue du Champ de mars, 6, B7000 Mons, Belgium. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Lee M. Akst MD

Lee M. Akst MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Abdul Latif Hamdan MD, MPH

Abdul Latif Hamdan MD, MPH

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
Antonio Schindler MD, PhD

Antonio Schindler MD, PhD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Phoniatric Unit, L. Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Petros D. Karkos MD, PhD, AFRCS

Petros D. Karkos MD, PhD, AFRCS

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Thessaloniki Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Rosaria Barillari MD, PhD

Maria Rosaria Barillari MD, PhD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Calvo-Henriquez MD

Christian Calvo-Henriquez MD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Lise Crevier-Buchman MD, PhD

Lise Crevier-Buchman MD, PhD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Camille Finck MD, PhD

Camille Finck MD, PhD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liège, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Young-Gyu Eun MD, PhD

Young-Gyu Eun MD, PhD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Sven Saussez MD, PhD

Sven Saussez MD, PhD

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France

Department of Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, University Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

These authors contributed equally to this article's supervision and should be considered co–last senior authors.

Search for more papers by this author
Michael F. Vaezi MD, PhD, MS

Michael F. Vaezi MD, PhD, MS

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

These authors contributed equally to this article's supervision and should be considered co–last senior authors.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2019
Citations: 42
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Abstract

Objective

To review the current literature about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Data Sources

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

Methods

A comprehensive review of the literature on LPR epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment was conducted. Using the PRISMA statement, 3 authors selected relevant publications to provide a critical analysis of the literature.

Conclusions

The important heterogeneity across studies in LPR diagnosis continues to make it difficult to summarize a single body of thought. Controversies persist concerning epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. No recent epidemiologic study exists regarding prevalence and incidence with the use of objective diagnostic tools. There is no survey that evaluates the prevalence of symptoms and signs on a large number of patients with confirmed LPR. Regarding diagnosis, an increasing number of authors used multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring, although there is no consensus regarding standardization of the diagnostic criteria. The efficiency of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy remains poorly demonstrated and misevaluated by incomplete clinical tools that do not take into consideration many symptoms and extralaryngeal findings. Despite the recent advances in knowledge about nonacid LPR, treatment protocols based on PPIs do not seem to have evolved.

Implications for Practice

The development of multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring and pepsin and bile salt detection should be considered for the establishment of a multiparameter diagnostic approach. LPR treatment should evolve to a more personalized regimen, including diet, PPIs, alginate, and magaldrate according to individual patient characteristics. Multicenter international studies with a standardized protocol could improve scientific knowledge about LPR.